It’s worth noting, though, that “The Secrets of Dumbledore” opened around the same time as the Warner Bros. So, the curious silence on another “Fantastic Beasts” chapter isn’t exactly encouraging. tentpoles, the studio waited only a few days after those movies were released to announce plans for sequels. With “Dune” and “Wonder Woman 1984,” two recent Warner Bros. doesn’t seem to be prioritizing another chapter in the “Fantastic Beasts” universe.
Unlike the original eight-film “Potter” franchise, which was adapted from a rich, doorstop of novels, Rowling only has flimsy source material for “Fantastic Beasts.” So, although the spinoff story was barreling toward the full-scale Wizarding War that’s waged between beloved Hogwarts professor Albus Dumbledore and the Voldemort-esque Gellert Grindelwald (you don’t need to be a fan of “Harry Potter” to know how the battle ends), Rowling and Steve Kloves - who co-wrote “The Secrets of Dumbledore” - don’t have a clearly established blueprint to reach the grand conclusion. were waiting to see the reception toward “The Secrets of Dumbledore” before pumping resources into the final chapters in the magical saga. There wasn’t yet a screenplay for the fourth or fifth entry by April 2022, when the third “Fantastic Beasts” movie opened in theaters. Ticket sales were down 20% from 2016’s “Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them,” which grossed more than $800 million globally. Though the second installment, 2018’s “Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald,” didn’t entirely sputter with $654 million at the worldwide box office, its rocky performance put the future of Newt Scamander - the protagonist played by Eddie Redmayne - and company in question.
0 kommentar(er)
